The Passion of Sacco and Vanzetti by Ben Shan |
After serving one term in Congress,
Rep. Vito Marcantonio was swept away in Franklin Delano Roosevelt's
1936 re-election king tide.
Marcantonio's defeat, Meyer wrote,
influenced his decision to become president of the ILD.
Yet, even with powerful waves rolling Democratic, Marc's opponent Jimmy Lanzetta barely prevailed by a vote of 18,772, to 17,212. Marc would win the rematch two years later.
In “Vito Marcantonio: Radical in
Congress,” Alan Schaffer posited that the freshman representative's
downfall could be blamed, in part, on his rift with Luigi Antonini,
leader of the powerful Italian Dressmakers Local 89,
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union.
The one-time allies split, Schaffer
asserted, when Marcantonio's efforts on behalf of the anti-fascist
struggle in Italy led to increasingly constructive contacts with
communists.
The matter is open to dispute. Some say Marc could never have withstood the Roosevelt landslide, but in any case, his next move was to assume the presidency of
the International Labor Defense (ILD).
In “Vito Marcantonio: Radical
Politician,”
Professor Gerald Meyer describes the ILD as brainchild
of Joseph Brodsky, legal counsel to the Communist Party, to which the
organization was tied.
Radical Defense
The ILD post, Meyer wrote, “catapulted
Marcantonio into the position of national spokesman for the left and
deepened his relationship with the Communist Party.”
In 1937, as International Labor Defense
chairman, Marcantonio penned the pamphlet, “Labor's Martyrs.”
The document was published with an introduction by William Z. Foster, a prominent American communist: “The militant trade union movement of today,” Foster wrote, “heading towards a broad People's Front, is the direct lineal descendant of the great strike movement of the 1886 Chicago martyrs.”
Foster is talking the "Popular Front" policy of international communists in the 1930s, which called for collaboration with other forces on the political left to combat surging fascism.
According to Meyer, it was a role
in which Marc's congressional experience enhanced the outfit's
infrastructure for influencing public policy.
Marc's work with the ILD involved him
in high-profile cases of the day, such as that of labor activist Tom
Mooney, wrongly jailed for bombing a World War I “Preparation Day”
parade in San Francisco. Marc joined the defense of West Coast
longshoremens union rabble-rouser Harry Bridges, whom the government
wanted to deport to Australia. He fought dictatorial Jersey City
Mayor Frank Hague over union and civil rights alike.
The document was published with an introduction by William Z. Foster, a prominent American communist: “The militant trade union movement of today,” Foster wrote, “heading towards a broad People's Front, is the direct lineal descendant of the great strike movement of the 1886 Chicago martyrs.”
With “The Chicago Martyrs,” he is linking
the policy to were those hung for the Haymarket Affair and it is with
that historical event Marcantonio begins his discourse. The second
part deals with the saga of Sacco and Vanzetti.
Entitled “Labor's Martyr's,” labor,
the organized kind, is the text's primary focus.
Marcantonio suggests that organized labor is American as apple pie, is in the country's DNA: “Noble attempts to build [the labor movement] had been made in the days of our Revolutionary forefathers,” he writes.
And Marc, a man who drew logistical
support and droves of votes from the union rank-and-file, knew his
syndicates.
Marcantonio suggests that organized labor is American as apple pie, is in the country's DNA: “Noble attempts to build [the labor movement] had been made in the days of our Revolutionary forefathers,” he writes.
The Haymarket Martyrs |
May Day Mayhem
He notes that Albert Parson, one of the Haymarket defendants [Marc prefers the term “victims”], “was a printer, a member of the powerful International Typographical Union which, even in those days, had over 60,000 members.”
Membership counts are the currency of
the union movement and source of their leverage in collective
bargaining and street action alike. A consummate political operative,
Marcantonio probably knew the rank-and-file tallies of the many
unions blossoming across the country at the time.
Applying color and pace, the phenom from
East Harlem recounts the Haymarket debacle with a prose shaded by a
sense of great grievance and a promise that labor's part in the
fighting that has just begun.
The text recalls the May Day strike of
1886. August Spies, a German metalworker and union organizer was
invited to speak at the McCormick Reaper plant in Chicago. Police
rushed the assembly with guns and clubs and scores were brutalized. A bomb was set off.
“Chicago papers were quick to point
out that 'only' two had lost their lives!” Marcantonio's
exclamation point underscores the purpose of this particular ILD
production, which is to tie labor's contemporary battles to prior
confrontations. To tell a longer, more emotional story.
In “Labor's Martyrs” Marc is less
the journalist and more the instigating pamphleteer. The text is a
call to action rather than an academic or purely historical work.
He notes that Albert Parson, one of the Haymarket defendants [Marc prefers the term “victims”], “was a printer, a member of the powerful International Typographical Union which, even in those days, had over 60,000 members.”
And it is a youthful work. Marcantonio
died at the age of 51 and accomplished his many achievements as a
young, brash and precocious force of life. He is just 35 years old at
this point in his truncated, yet breathless career.
Marcantonio writes that Spies rushed
back to the German radical paper “Arbeiter-Zeitung,” which we
highlight simply because he does not run from the word “radical”
the way most American politicians did and still do.
Authorities hung the bombing on eight anarchists making them a part of labor history in the process.
Vanzetti and Sacco |
Authorities hung the bombing on eight anarchists making them a part of labor history in the process.
“What the press made of it is one of
the rawest frame-up trials in American history,” he writes,
factually, vintage Marcantonio, who often resorted to expressions
like “rawest” and “frame-up,” because of whom he chose to
defend and the kind of battles he was obliged to fight.
“The newspapers from coast to coast,
our worthy 'New York Times' not excepted, howled for their blood,
raved about an Anarchist plot to blow up Chicago, seize the
government, murder, arson, pillage, rape – the whole program which
William Randolph Hearst has made only too familiar to the American
public.”
Marcantonio had a special axe to grind when it came to Hearst, whose newspapers relentlessly attacked the congressman.
Marcantonio continues: “The judge,
Judge Gary, gave one of the most shameful performances that this
country has ever seen, and it has seen plenty from its judges.”
Marc, that ambitious first generation
son of Italian immigrants, loves America when it fulfills its
promise, but his brand of patriotism does not preclude the telling of
a true, people's history.
That people's history he told had words
of the following kind: “The bigoted speeches of the prosecutor
Grinnell, and his aides, are equaled only by the speeches of the
prosecution in the Mooney case, the Herndon case, the Scottsboro
case. In other words, they established a fine precedent for all
anti-labor prosecutions.”
Marcantonio knows of what he speaks,
because he served as an assistant U.S. attorney, a primarily prosecutorial
post. He is writing on behalf of the International Labor Defense, a
legal outfit, and as the lawyer chosen to spearhead its political
efforts.
Marcantonio had a special axe to grind when it came to Hearst, whose newspapers relentlessly attacked the congressman.
Gerald Meyer writes that Hearst's “Daily Mirror”
described Marcantonio as a “political maggot” who “must feed on
decay and corruption to survive.”
Lawyered Up
The focus is legal, and his point is
that “Labor's Martyrs” were created as much in courtrooms as in
the streets or on the shop floor. There is more than a chronicle
going on here. There is this larger question of labor's role at the
crux of 1930s social change and revolution.
After the Haymarket convictions,
Marcantonio wrote, “Chicago papers collected a purse of $100,000 to
divide among them as reward for work well done.”
He doesn't offer any evidence. If Marc
seeks a more just labor law, he is not beyond spinning a bit of labor
lore in that effort.
“And then came the appeal to the
United States Supreme Court,” he forges ahead. “Old as they are,
none of the present incumbents were then sitting on the bench. But
their worthy forerunners were equally reactionary.”
A keen sarcasm, laced with indignation, was a tool Marc used for slashing the arguments of opponents from the House Well, or the East Harlem street corner. It was not academic talk. It was a popular lexicon he could employ at will, without condescending, because it was his own organic idiom.
“They did not die in vain,” he
rallies. “Taught by the lessons of the Haymarket tragedy, such an
organization as the International Labor Defense has been built by the
workers and progressive people of America, to stand guard and prevent
such legal murders today.”
“Legal murders.”
Marc as master of the subversive
sobriquet.
Marcantonio Scribe then recalls, “two other labor martyrs who must be honored at the same time as the Haymarket heroes. The tenth anniversary of their death coincides with the fiftieth anniversary of the former in this year 1937.”
Here he is writing of Nicola Sacco and
Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Marc begins with a quotation from the latter.
“I am suffering because I am a
radical, and indeed I am a radical; I have suffered because I was an
Italian, and indeed I am Italian; I have suffered more for my family
and for my beloved than for myself; but I am so convinced to be right
that you could execute me two times, and if I could be reborn two
other times I would live again to do what I have done already.”
It is a generous passage granted by the writer; gives voice to one unjustly silenced, in their own chosen words.
“To me these words are particularly
poignant,” writes Marcantonio. “For I am an Italian, and proud to
be of the same people that produced such a great spirit as Vanzetti,
the descendant of Garibaldi, the forerunner of those heroic
anti-fascist brothers who are today fighting Fascism and Mussolini in
Italy and Spain.”
Marc positions himself firmly along the
historical leftist continuum; openly links himself to men executed
for murder by the state. And he joins that tradition to the Italian
spirit for the benefit of his constituents who were subject to a
career-long history lesson from the
settlement-house-teacher-cum-congressman.
Marcantonio writes of Sacco and Vanzetti, as workers and organizers.
“Both found only hard knocks. Sacco
was a shoe worker. Vanzetti had followed many trades after his
arrival here in the summer of 1908. He worked in mines, mills,
factories. Finally he landed in a cordage plant in Plymouth,
Massachusetts. That was the last factory job he held. For here, as in
all the others, he talked union and organization, and organized a
successful strike. After that, he was blacklisted for good and had to
make a living peddling fish to his Italian neighbors in the little
town known as the cradle of liberty.”
Marc sees, not just victims of legal
murder, but heroes in their own right, beyond their victimization:
“The tragedy of their untimely and cruel death is still an open
wound in the hearts of many of us who remember them as shining
spirits, as truly great men such as only the lowly of the earth can
produce.”
For Marc, this is the meaning of Sacco
and Vanzetti.
The Lowly of the Earth. These were
Marcantonio's chosen constituency. His decision to join forces with
the ILD rather than hang around Washington D.C., and peddle his
influence in some lucrative fashion, says all that needs to be said
about his motivations.
With “Labor's Martyrs,” and his wider activities for the ILD, Marcantonio demonstrated how his electoral defeat in no wise diminished his fight for that constituency. Being a congressman was just one way to achieve the same ends.
Marcantonio was not a career
“politician,” so much as a dedicated advocate for the Lowly of the Earth.
"The Goodfather (A Novel): The Rising Fall of the Marvelous Marcantonio," can be found here: MARC LIVES!
A keen sarcasm, laced with indignation, was a tool Marc used for slashing the arguments of opponents from the House Well, or the East Harlem street corner. It was not academic talk. It was a popular lexicon he could employ at will, without condescending, because it was his own organic idiom.
Sacco and Vanzetti
Marcantonio Scribe then recalls, “two other labor martyrs who must be honored at the same time as the Haymarket heroes. The tenth anniversary of their death coincides with the fiftieth anniversary of the former in this year 1937.”
It is a generous passage granted by the writer; gives voice to one unjustly silenced, in their own chosen words.
Linked to the Struggle
Marcantonio writes of Sacco and Vanzetti, as workers and organizers.
With “Labor's Martyrs,” and his wider activities for the ILD, Marcantonio demonstrated how his electoral defeat in no wise diminished his fight for that constituency. Being a congressman was just one way to achieve the same ends.
"The Goodfather (A Novel): The Rising Fall of the Marvelous Marcantonio," can be found here: MARC LIVES!
No comments:
Post a Comment